‘Purely Gypsy Behaviour’: Interpreting Negative Stereotypes in Racist Police Violence Cases at the European Court of Human Rights
Main Article Content
Article Sidebar
Published
May 24, 2024
Emma Várnagy
Abstract
The European Court of Human Rights has issued judgements that condemn negative stereotypes and protect vulnerable groups from discrimination. Paradoxically, in cases where the victims’ bodily integrity is violated in a racist context, the Court has a particularly dubious record of fully engaging with the discrimination aspect of the complaints. This article analyses five illustrative cases where evidentiary materials indicate the authorities held strong prejudices against Romani victims of police violence. Through the lens of vulnerability and anti-stereotyping, the article examines how the Court responds to the presence of negative stereotypes in anti-Romani police violence cases. It shows that the Court’s engagement with stereotypes in these cases is inconsistent. The article suggests that a more conscious engagement with the wider societal context of anti-Romani police violence could strengthen the Court’s stance against harmful Romaphobic stereotyping.
How to Cite
Várnagy, E. (2024). ‘Purely Gypsy Behaviour’: Interpreting Negative Stereotypes in Racist Police Violence Cases at the European Court of Human Rights . Critical Romani Studies, 6(1), 4–23. Retrieved from https://crs.ceu.edu/index.php/crs/article/view/165
Article Details
Keywords
stereotypes, vulnerability, racist police violence, European Court of Human Rights, Roma rights
Issue
Section
Articles
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication. The work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.